You keep using that word...

I've received much good feedback on my last post about the pudding-headed report criticising the new DHS smartcard program.  Many people are justifyiably mystified by the report's references to Bluetooth.  The strange thing isn't that the new smartcard doesn't use Bluetooth, but that smart cards and Bluetooth have absolutely nothing to do with each other.  It's like asking, "Doesn't the new Honda Accord suffer from all the well documented problems of Esperanto?"  The short answer is "no", the real answer is, "what the hell are you talking about?"

The problem, of course, is buzzword creep.  With all the industry terminology floating around these days, it's hard for people to remember whether combining two particular concepts produces an argument that's coherent (like biometrics and privacy) or less so (like pancakes and the doctrine of original intent).  That modesty does not typically hinder such people from writing technology assesments or legal opinions is beyond the scope of this blog post. 

Bluetooth, a fine technology with many years of buzzwordiness behind it, is particularly suseptible to such content-free punditry.  In service to all the technology companies who make perfectly good products that have nothing to do with Bluetooth, but feel market pressure to be 100% buzzword compliant, I offer the following decal:

You wouldn't put it on a cell phone (whether it had Bluetooth or not), but you could stick it onto a toaster, tax software, or a government smart card.  I'd start sticking it on our software boxes, but I bet our attorneys wouldn't be too happy.